Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau on Classic Liberalism - 1091 Words

Everyone has their own very unique views on everything in the world. What’s right and what’s wrong is a good example of how humanity views different subjects let’s say a man kills another man to protect his family from harm he may see it as okay to do but in the bible it says â€Å"thou shall should not kill† so it’s all how you look at it. In this paper I will be discussing the different view point of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau on the most basic tenets of classical liberalism. For example the states of nature, the social contracts, and the sets of view of the rights and obligations of citizens and states. My first topic that I will be discussing is the different views of social contracts. It will go in order from Hobbes to Locke then to Rousseau. As I was pointing out in the intro I will be starting off with Hobbes perspective of social contract. Hobbes believes in a â€Å"civil society† which is humanity’s natural state that is ran by fear and ever-present insecurity. There is always a solution to every problem with this problem the solution is to go to war then see the fear of the society and their insecurities of that war, then the government using their reason to discover ways out of the conflict thus ending the war. Hobbes pretty much sums this up by saying â€Å"agreeing to end the war†. He says that â€Å"They come to see the fear and insecurity of their persons and possessions in the state of nature as undesirable, and peace and order as desirable.† Which means that they rejectShow MoreRelatedJohn Locke: Founding Father of Modern Era Liberalism1444 Words   |  6 PagesThomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke are all great thinkers who were greatly influential in forming phil osophies that would affect the future of politics. By analyzing each philosopher’s ideology, we can identify which thinker’s theory reflected modern era liberalism the most. For this paper I will be arguing that, John Locke provides a more compelling framework of modern era liberalism because of his perception of the state of nature, the social contract and the function of governmentRead MoreThe Social Contract Theory Since The United States1449 Words   |  6 Pagesthe point clear in two senses. First, the Framers of the Constitution realized the notion of social contract as the very nature of being a nation-state as emerged in the thinking of modern philosophers like Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke (1632-1704), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). In such contract, the people are the subject tough they do not directly involve in the process. Second, the word „weâ€Å" poses the meaning of democracy as the government ruled by the people (Greece, demos :Read MoreLiberal Perspective of a State7979 Words   |  32 PagesINTRODUCTION Liberalism has meant many things over the last 400 years and has provided significant benefits to the human race. Basically, liberalism is the belief in the importance of liberty and equal rights and so, the main theme of liberalism throughout the period of its development was that the purpose of state is the promotion and protection of human freedom and equality and ensuring of human happiness. Liberalism meant the removal of traditional distinctions that were imposed on people. Read MoreThe Contributions Of John Rawls Essay5959 Words   |  24 Pagesjustification to the use of coercive power by the state as it would take a form where the citizens under the conditions of freedom, give there give their consent. This theory is called Justice as fairness. THE ORIGINAL POSITION Like Locke, Hobbes, Kant and Rousseau, John Rawls also belongs to the social contract tradition where persons’ moral and/or political obligation help them to follow the provisions or agreements of a contract which states the duties and rights of the people in a civil societyRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagesof organizations. The authors’ sound scholarship and transparent style of writing set the book apart, making it an ingenious read which invites reflexivity, criticalness and plurality of opinion from the audience. This is a book that will become a classic in organization studies. Mihaela L. Kelemen, Professor of Management Studies, Keele University, UK An unusually rich and deep philosophical book on organization theory with several new thinkers and ideas. Pedagogically a well-structured book with